However, this is only one side of the knowledgebase concept. The purpose of a health record is to create a
patient-specific knowledgebase of relevant health information. There is a clear role for the carry-through
of knowledgebase concepts into the patient-specific data set. Clinical decision trees structured on the
input side allow us almost unlimited ability to present new and existing
knowledge to the end user and, beyond presentation, provide clinical decision
support. Once selections on a particular
patient are made, we have begun, effectively, to create this secondary
knowledgebase, one that is specific to the patient. Much of the purpose of
health care reform is to acknowledge the value of this patient-specific
knowledgebase and create a health care delivery system that shares this
information. Every provider involved in the care of the patient must have
access to this knowledgebase.
If you’re already involved with EHRs you’ll be familiar with
the Continuity of Care Document (CCD), which is really about sharing patient
health information between providers. In the year ahead, you’ll hear a lot more
about Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) at the state level. HIEs are all
about expanding and coordinating the sharing of patient health information, en
route to sharing not just at the state level but the national level.
Lest we get caught up in acronyms, here’s a salient point:
it’s no longer good enough for EHRs just to record results; they must drive
better results. The Health Care Reform term is “improving patient outcomes”. Stage 1 certification doesn’t yet push hard on
this standard. The level of clinical decision support required at stage 1 is
very basic and, for many EHRs, is covered by the e-prescribing interface. Going
forward, the bar will rise significantly and the value of a rules-based and
content-driven knowledgebase approach will emerge.
Jim Grue, O.D.
No comments:
Post a Comment